• In what ways does your video use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
The music video is a genre I have explored extensively these last few months. The format most extensively used for this medium is the one that we adopted; a band playing music. However we did not simply conform to the idea that we should film the band playing the song in some surreal environment, as is often the way opted into by labels or video producers.
This is queens of the stone age, performing in an environment completely unheard of in the history of reality. This format presents the band as offworldly, perhaps divine. This can increase the distance between artist and audience, and will create publicity and fame. Our video however, challenges this concept. We wanted teenagers and males of a wide age range to be able to relate to our video. Not to idolize or worship us, as seems to be the intention with this example from QOTSA. We wanted our audience to go "Hey, this looks fun, being in a band and having some fun in a school. Playing loud, singing proud and just letting it all out!". We wanted to seem down to earth, realist. With no budget and just a band at our disposal this looked to be a fun project.
We also developed ideas presented by this genre of music video by shooting each band member individually. While it is a stock-classic rock and roll video, I feel it has a unique feel presented by the fun, humorous attitude adopted by the band members. Throughout the video there is evident enjoyment in the performance. But not in the sense of showboating, as would take place in a gig or in a traditional music video, but actually getting enthusiastic about the song.
Essentially, we took the concept of the traditional, face on, no frills band playing music video and followed it. We followed it for a song we love, with something we love doing. We put our own twist on it and I am proud of it. We had a laugh.

• How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
All of my products, including my video, stick to the rock theme. Mainly around my guitar, and me. Playing the frontman I embody the song into the same medium it was produced in (a band with a lead singer/guitarist). The whole video is self explanatory, not patronising or being subtly meaningful to the passive audience. We wanted to portray the image of raw, musical fun. This is why we objectified the video into the simple yet effective image of 'guy with guitar'. My advert for example gives an interesting yet simple image that basically says the same thing as the video. My digipack does the same thing, a simple brick wall and limited palette. Simple yet effective. My skills in photoshop have been useful in helping me create superb looking images for all my products.
• What have you learned from your audience feedback?
I have got multiple pieces of feedback for my work. I was told for example to put words on the spine of my digipack. Here is a screenshot of me doing it on photoshop and the finalised image.
The video on youtube had multiple responses, here is a screenshot.


Finally the comments on facebook, the most public and personal of all feedback sources. We created a group on which to upload the video and all other products that we made.

As you can see, people seemed to like the fact that Ben (the guitarist) was able to enjoy the song and have fun with the improvised performance. This is the reason we included the clip at the end, to give the audience a portion of the laugh we experienced whilst filming it.
People have told me in person that they think it is a great video, the timing is good and cohesive, the subject matter is instantly apparant, the energy of the song is clearly portrayed in the performance given by me and my fellow band members. Overall feedback is good. If I would change anything based on the opinions given by onlookers, I would act more energetically and just generally better. But we worked that out during the editing process anyway.
• How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages of all your products?
Photoshop was a massive tool in my production. I am very literate in the program and therefore utilised this to create images for the entire project. But the thing that was the biggest challenge, as well as the most useful tool, was Final Cut. Neither me or doug had any idea how to use this thing, neither of us had ever even used a mac for more than a couple of minutes. We were both PC guys, and we were thrust into a world of unfamiliarity, with the deadline fast approaching.
We tackled it. We both managed to learn how to use the program quickly and efficiently. Capturing the footage off the camera was simple (besides when the tape was scratched and unusable) and was executed easily and directly. From here on in me and Doug knew what we wanted to achieve. Get the good looking ones, put them on the timeline, arrange accordingly. The unrefined, raw video that we had the vision of came with the careful arrangement of this organised chaos that we found our editing process to be. It was fun, we got to look back at all the things we had recorded and choose from an arsenal of brilliant footage. We agreed on most things. If it was in time with the song and used some kind of creative camera use, we used it. We spent a lot of time in room 20 arranging, cutting, expanding and rearranging those tiny clips around. But I learnt not only how to use a great, modern program, but also the logic behind every piece of media out there. Not only music video's, but television, film, advertising, anything! The editing process is huge, complex, unstable. It is delicate and precise and above all, difficult. It is an art I would love to master, and one of the most empowering and satisfying things I have ever done within the education system.
OVERALL I am extremely proud of my efforts with the video. I think it was a success. I think that we envisioned something and made it happen. The zombies thing failed to materialise, but all the same we created something beautiful. We did not need the sub plot to overcomplicate things and confuse a potential audience with irrelevant nonsense about the undead. Although it would have been cool, the video is fast paced enough as it is. Zombies held no reference to the meaning within the song. My personal interpretation is that the lyrics mean very little, they are just all encompassing words made up in some jam, in a practice room in the bands early days. This is why I believe our video works so well. It does not tie any meaning to anything, make euphemisms or imply hidden lessons of life. It just takes the music, and turns it into something visual. A band, just having fun, playing the song. Practicing in the underbelly of britain hoping to one day make it big. Honesty is a quality many video's seem to lack these days.
I have learnt so much these past few months. This really is an industry I would like to find myself in, media production. It is hands on, practical. What we reaped is what we sewed. I am proud of myself and of Doug. We came through and worked hard and stayed committed and did not get bogged down about the whole thing. I got my band involved in making a video, something I have wanted to do for quite a while now. We learnt how to use a program totally alien to us. We learnt how to use a video camera, one of the most influential and historic inventions of all time to create vision. I am happy with the result. I can watch our video over and over again. Yes, there are blemishes and imperfections that we have learnt from. But we made it, against all odds we rose triumphant and created something to be proud of. We rock.







